A fate of «neorealism» is in literary criticism

Abstract

The author of the article calls to history of origin of one of interesting and polemic terms of beginning of ХХ of century - «neorealism». A fact of existence of neorealism is in literature, and then and literary criticism, through philosophy, was obvious. However, claim of his concept value had a
heavy way. Research of specific of neorealism artistic letter interested yet in the beginning the last century of the Russian literary critics: Е. Koltonovcki and М. Доlengо. These authors the first neorealism researches belong to in literary criticism. In spite of closeness of conceptual determinations of neorealism, literary critics marked his synthetic character, from here and row of primary determinations of neorealism vision and decorative design on the letter of new aesthetic possibilities in literature. By the predecessors of the name «neorealism» were: the «mystic realism», «realistic symbolism», «realistic romanticism», «romantic realism», «mythological realism», «metaphysical realism», «scientific realism» of and other. All these names in one or another measure exposed the special character of new image of life, that broke stereotypes, bursting in f iction with new ideas, leit -motifs, denudation of true, physiology of perception and expansion of various language borders. During ХХ of century researchers called to the mystery of neorealism character of letter, but single opinion not set. The closed of the socialistic system limited possibilities of excessive infatuation for neorealism analytical expressions that counter to the only possible method of socialistic realism. Not insignificant role in claim of neorealism Z. Potapova played in literary criticism, V. Fashenko, V. Keldish, С. Тuzkov and other.